mom2rtk
Invented the term "Characterpalooza"
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
Well, a state line runs literally down the middle of the metro area. And some people just can't quite grasp that other people have different circumstances from them.I'm not sure which posters have and haven't but I haven't kept insisting you can't limit leisure travel. When people discuss travel they almost never specify distance or mode of transportation. It's "we need to limit travel" and usually the method is "we need to stop people from going from state to state" Plane travel is at least somewhat regulated, most people will show IDs (you can travel through TSA in the U.S. technically without one), there's passenger manifests, etc. It would still have issues but is on a different level than cars. It's why in NY they've heavily focused on planes because it's a mode of transportation much more easily tracked.
I don't really have much of a need to go to the coasts right now but I travel to the state next to me way too often. It's my personal experience there that tells me prohibiting travel between my state and the state next to me isn't some light switch and because of the work and distance to necessities there would be too many exemptions. I don't think telling my aunt to go 10 miles the opposite way to go to the grocery store just because it's on this side of the state line makes much sense when the closest one to hers just happens to be on the other side of the state line. And while getting food may not be for fun that wouldn't be entirely different if I wanted to go to the park to go look at Christmas lights in my car at a large display on the other side of the state line from me.
I think people think it's just a "raining on my parade" moment even though it's just people talking thru it and I really can see how that can come across that way.