This is the wisest thing said in this thread so far. That covers this topic very well.most folks don't really care WHY changes occur. Why doesn't matter that much -- DDP is, and will be, what it is.
This is the wisest thing said in this thread so far. That covers this topic very well.most folks don't really care WHY changes occur. Why doesn't matter that much -- DDP is, and will be, what it is.
Honestly, the WHY factor is the most interesting part for me.....and I think for alot of us who post ad nauseum on these posts.
Most people love to know why. That's how conversations change and grow. Otherwise, we'd be reduced to only factual exchanges.
I have walked away from some "bargains" as well.Oh, I don't disagree. We do make decisions based on what's right for each of us. I will admit, though, that if a WHY doesn't fit with my moral or ethical viewpoint, I will probably skip the opportunity no matter how well it fits financially.
Honestly, the WHY factor is the most interesting part for me.....and I think for alot of us who post ad nauseum on these posts.
Most people love to know why. That's how conversations change and grow. Otherwise, we'd be reduced to only factual exchanges.
The why is simple, the DDP is very popular. Disney can make more $$$ by cutting back the plan. Removing the included tip is probably saving Disney $7-$10. That significantly increases the profitability of the plan.
I'm not sure if the appetizer cut back is a response to guests "stretching" credits by sharing, is designed to improve table turnover or is just designed to save Disney another couple of dollars.
I don't think this is an ethical or moral question. Just a company that want to make more money on a popular plan.
I'm sure noone here - certainly not me - is doubting what you said. You have always been both honest and accurate.
I think several of us got the impression that you were told the "party line," which is exactly what I would expect inside sources to tell you. "It's not our fault -- the customers want this!"
Nobody is questioning you, or the accuracy of your information -- just not buying the rationale the Disney folks say is bringing about any possible changes.
The party line is given to guests calling Disney guest services, I certainly know the difference. There is no reason to give me the party line when speaking with close friends. I am sure you have close friends that are honest with you.
It just seems at times especially on Dining issues, some believe their opinions to be more factual or correct that others.
But as someone else posted why does not matter to them only that changes will occur, well I can tell you that I was not given the party line on that, I was told what changes will occur.
Time will tell.
I do think LewisC is very accurate in saying that using the appetizers to stretch the meals is a concern. The desserts truly do not lend to abuse but the appetizers truly can make a meal.
And even though many will say that by sharing they are not eating any meals they did not pay for the main thing that is happening is you have more people in the restuarants more often than planned and that is a major problem.
Guests not being able to get into a FS restaurant without months of advance planning is a major complaint. Restaurants are turning away a very large number of angry guests.
I had suspected it was table turnover, but credit-stretching might be the reason as well.
Has Disney made a formal announcement yet or is this still all speculation? If they made the suggested cuts but lowered the price a little, it would be less painful!