See you are ignoring what I am saying to argue an unrelated point. This is what happened in that overly long thread months ago as well. Against rules or not is not what defines a commercial activity. This person has figured out how to do commercial activity within whatever rules they are working with. It's still commercial.
I didn't say the DIS has to police it, I'm just saying we should stop pretending we don't know it's commercial use, because even the faintest amount of common sense tells us it is.