Cafeen
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
Some people are also the inverse of your mother, they feel they have to get the more expensive items simply because they want to get value rather than getting what they want. Just another side of the same coin (which, I'm sure you'd agree with).My mother is the exact same way. She grew up very poor and likes being able to order whatever she wants without worrying about the price. If it is already paid for, she feels less "guilty" about paying crazy prices for a meal at WDW. She would always prefer to get the Dining Plan.
Yes, and this is VERY very important to keep in mind when doing the math. There's another side to it though, and that's comparing what you're "ideal" dining experience is vs what you'd spring for OOP.My family is different. I am very much an anal planner. Using the menus on allears, I calculated the cost based on what we would really order. I think what gets lost is that many are spending money on things that they would not really order. If not on the plan, we would not get a dessert with lunch. I also would prefer plain 'ol ice water for lunch. At a few restaurants, I would just get an appetizer and dessert. We have already decided not to use the dining plan on our trip next summer (unless they chose to give it to us free and I do not anticipate that happening). For our family, the dining plan does turn out to be more money. I chose to calculate based on what we would really order and we just spend less that way.
The best way that I can illustrate this is by personal example, so you all are coming with me on my trip in Sept/Oct. And by coming with me, I mean taking a peek into my mind when I made the decision to spring for DxDDP .
When I do my math, I compare what I'd be getting and where I'd be going OOP vs DxDDP. As such, the locations and orders changed between the two. I then worked my magic (e.g. let my spreadsheet calculate) and came out to ~$500/10 days for OOP or $680/10 days for DxDDP. I took those two numbers (or rather, the $180 difference) and compared that to the gain by going DxDDP. I'd gain roughly $450 worth of value for that $180 spent. I'd also be much closer to my ideal trip due to the differences in locations and experiences (actually, pretty much spot on). As such, I made the decision that spending this extra $180 was worth it for the increased gain in the trip. So, yes, I could have gotten away cheaper, (and, as I've been known to say, I could have decided to eat PB&J for the entire trip ), but I felt that it was worthwhile to me to spend a bit more to enjoy much more.
So, the comparison of what you'd order for real is a very important piece of the puzzle, but it's not the whole picture if you get my drift.
Of course, this may all change next year....
While I'm not speaking for Havoc, I fully agree with his choice of Tony's. Given the choice of Tony's, Plaza, or CP, Tony's would be the way to go for this illustration as it represents the middle of the road cost-wise. Choosing the top end (CP) is roughly as valid as choosing the bottom end (Plaza) for this type of example. Alternatively, you can replace MK with a resort and likewise choose the middle of the road option, the illustration remains the same.Havoc,
Love your posts and analyses when it comes to DDP. In the above example, though, why did you have the hypothetical adult eat at Tony's in MK? Send them to dinner at Crystal Palace (at $40+ if I remember correctly) and now you have some plan value. Throw in a spouse and a couple of kiddos and there's even more value.
Personally, I doubt that I would ever buy a plan. But we do have free dining next month. And since our ADR's include CP, 1900 PF, Boma, Ohana's and CRT, I'm pretty happy at the $1,000+ "value" of the free dining promo to us (much more than any room discount would bring) . . .
I think both "sides" of the fence agree that using the extremes on either side don't illustrate the realities very well. As he's already responded in my slowbutt typing skills (I'm working, really I am.)