CanBeGrumpy
<font color="red">Has a built in Mayo gag reflex
- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Messages
- 705
Had the follow-up mammogram today and everything in BENIGN!! YAY!! Wow, though, I didn't know you could squeeze a breast so tightly and not damage it forever!!! I guess once they squished everything, the area of "asymmetric density" looked just like the rest of the breast, and the microcalcifications are benign. So, great news and I hope everyone going through the same thing (mammogram call-back) gets the same news that I did.
Also, thank you to everyone who responded to this thread. You helped me relax and not worry too much. Thanks for your help and support!!
I'm about to turn 39 and I had my first (baseline) mammogram on Friday. I was told that a lot of times you are called back after the baseline test because the doctor doesn't have anything to compare the images to. Well, sure enough, I get a call back. The nurse practitioner read me the report, and I guess the areas of concern are "small group of microcalcifications in both breasts. Area of asymmetric density in left breast".
My left breast has been hurting for a few months, which is why I went for the mammogram in the first place. So the fact that they found something doesn't surprise me, but I was really hoping it would something easily explained. My question is, do these things seem particularly worrisome? The soonest appointment I could get for the "diagnostic" mammogram was September 29, a full MONTH away!! The order is for "magnification views", which for some reason sounded ominous to me. Is that common for a follow-up diagnostic mammogram? Or does it mean the area looked really serious?
I am trying not to freak out because I was warned that I might get a call-back due to it being my first mammogram. I looked up microcalcifications and it seems that they can indicate cancer, but only maybe 20% of the time. I haven't looked up "asymmetric density" yet, because it seems so broad of a description.
So, do any of you know anything about this? Is it really, really common to need a follow-up to your first mammogram? Thanks for any info you can give!
Also, thank you to everyone who responded to this thread. You helped me relax and not worry too much. Thanks for your help and support!!
I'm about to turn 39 and I had my first (baseline) mammogram on Friday. I was told that a lot of times you are called back after the baseline test because the doctor doesn't have anything to compare the images to. Well, sure enough, I get a call back. The nurse practitioner read me the report, and I guess the areas of concern are "small group of microcalcifications in both breasts. Area of asymmetric density in left breast".
My left breast has been hurting for a few months, which is why I went for the mammogram in the first place. So the fact that they found something doesn't surprise me, but I was really hoping it would something easily explained. My question is, do these things seem particularly worrisome? The soonest appointment I could get for the "diagnostic" mammogram was September 29, a full MONTH away!! The order is for "magnification views", which for some reason sounded ominous to me. Is that common for a follow-up diagnostic mammogram? Or does it mean the area looked really serious?
I am trying not to freak out because I was warned that I might get a call-back due to it being my first mammogram. I looked up microcalcifications and it seems that they can indicate cancer, but only maybe 20% of the time. I haven't looked up "asymmetric density" yet, because it seems so broad of a description.
So, do any of you know anything about this? Is it really, really common to need a follow-up to your first mammogram? Thanks for any info you can give!