Rise of the Resitance is most overrated ride in Orlando

[DavidNYC]

I have never been more disapointed in a ride.

There is almost zero thrill factor except that one tiny drop. The ride vehicle is really dull. Remys was even more fun and thats pretty disapointing as well. At times it feels like you are on a slow moving tea cups ride.

The sets are big but mostly static. Very little movement. They arent game changing. Feel like some screens as background could of brought some life to it.

Nothing on old star wars. Kylo ren just isnt interesting. Why oh why is there no original characters.

They dont even do star wars music in the background to get you in the vibe.

Ive done it twice now. Zero interest in ever doing it again. It was just a boring ride.

Why does this get so much praise? I cant be the only one confused by this?

The guardians of the galaxy roller coaster ride should of been the e ticket stars wars ride. How amazing would of that been.

You lost me as soon as you stated you were judging this as if it were designed to be a thrill ride . . . .

 

[mi*vida*loca]

I’m too old for every ride to be a thrill ride. That’s why I like Disney so much. I can get on a rollercoastsr then do a cute boat ride and give my body a break.

 

[Gabby01]

I’m too old for every ride to be a thrill ride. That’s why I like Disney so much. I can get on a rollercoastsr then do a cute boat ride and give my body a break.

I was never a roller coaster person even when I was young, lol. I assume Disney did some market research and found that Star Wars nerds are more likely to prefer motion simulators--hence why they are incorporated on all 3 Star Wars rides.

 

[asgur5]

You lost me as soon as you stated you were judging this as if it were designed to be a thrill ride . . . .

Except i didnt.

Rides shouldnt be seperated into thrill or no thrill. A thrill component is simply one of many aspects of a ride.

Those aspects include theming, thrill, wow moments, length, originality, humour and soundtrack. I comment on many of these aspects in my post.

 

[ucf_knight]

Except i didnt.

Rides shouldnt be seperated into thrill or no thrill. A thrill component is simply one of many aspects of a ride.

Those aspects include theming, thrill, wow moments, length, originality, humour and soundtrack. I comment on many of these aspects in my post.

What’s your favorite non roller coaster based attraction?

 

[Ensusieasm]

This is US, too! FOP one of our top 5 attractions anywhere in all the Disney parks, US and international. It feels like we're missing something if we miss FOP on a trip! Different strokes.......

Yes! FOP Is the best!
I once rode FOP 5 times in a row with no wait!

 

[zdad59]

Different strokes for different folks. We love it. As another poster noted, it's built as an immersive experience, not a thrill ride. Hope you find other rides to enjoy.