StarCruzer
Million Miler Member - Carousel of Progress
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2021
- Messages
- 598
I know the point you're wanting to make that access has in some form been restricted but that's essentially positioning the perspective to fit the statement. Like I stated in a previous comment the monorail at TDR is not free for anyone, everyone has to pay for it including going to their Ikspirari shopping area (akin to Disney Springs and Downtown Disney). Anyone has access to the monorail and many take a train to the Resort Gateway Station also known as the JR station also know as the Maihama Station where Ikspirari is located at, to get to the other hotels including Toy Story you'd either take a bus or the monorail. It's hard to say why they put the restrictions in place TBH especially considering there's 10 other places between 3 hotels that aren't exclusive (one of which is only exclusive for breakfast).
I'm a little confused by your point on this one. The TDR monorail charges, yes. Charging for rides doesn't make it less of a public service. What it actually means is that they aren't pulling funding for maintenance of the service from hotel guests. You can see this in the quality of the monorail: larger cars, cleaner, better overall design. Everyone is entitled to ride it, because everyone pays the same price, regardless of their reason for using it.
The complaint OP has is that Disney in the US charges premium prices for hotels on the monorail loop because it is billed as an amenity of stayin at that resort. I mean Contemporary even charges extra for monorail-view rooms!
So TDR now has two separate deterrents to prevent overcrowding in new hotels: restricting access to some areas, even temporarily, to hotel guest only; and that a few folks would likely decide against wandering through a hotel lobby if it was going to cost them a few extra bucks on transportation to do so.
Fantasy Springs isn't the only TDR resort to restrict guest access, AND they had to do so to to a similar issue as GF has: park proximity. Not sure if the Toy Story Hotel still has restrictions as well, but it opened in April 2022 and when we visited TDR in October of 2023 it was still listed as restricted access to paying guests only. These restrictions are usually out in place due to predicted guest behavior--AKA, new hotels in the past have experienced overcrowding issues and TDR is taking preventative measures for a positive hotel guest experience.
My argument wasn't necessarily that WDW should restrict non-paying guests from visiting resorts, only that there is precident to temporarily have restrictions in place which improve the experience of paying guests.
I feel like we're arguing the same side here though? Tourism is skyrocking in Japan but statistically, it is 80% domestic tourism. This is because the yen is so weak that most Japanese folks are not traveling internationally. So yes, you are going to see more locals in TDR. Like Disneyland in CA, it is considered a local's park, moreso after the opening of Shanghai Disney.As a fun fact since we've been talking about crowdedness even though tourism has skyrocketed to Japan, even with this large expansion with the new hotel TDR expects to fall short of their desired attendance, it was weird to read that after having visited there seeing the crowds. Realistically most visitors will stop off at Ikspirari to dine and shop but I who stayed at the Hilton Tokyo Bay (located next door to Toy Story Hotel) could indeed make dining reservations for various hotel restaurants and so can the general public.
As far as tourists IDK I think you're stereotyping there. I saw more western people (primarily Australian and Europeans with a smaller amount of Americans) in Kanazawa than I did at Tokyo Disney Resort in the 4 days we were at TDR and our largest language barrier by far was at TDR where Japanese was vastly spoken with very little other languages. I rather doubt that the sheer amount of cosplay I saw during the Halloween season was tourists as opposed to locals who were more willing to dress up in full on Belle with hoop skirts to ride virtually nothing. The only way to get into the parks are by buying 1-day tickets or an evening weekday or weekend pass. Even at the Hilton there was not as many westerners than you'd think for an American brand. The hotel's food was heavily catered to Japanese cuisine (Asian as whole but very much Japanese too) with their breakfast buffets having entire large sections dedicated to this.
I have many expat friends who live in Japan and while overall quality of life items (transportation, healthcare, food, clothing, etc ) are much cheaper, salaries are also MUCH lower. Even thought day tickets to Disney are also cheaper than the US, they still offer the after 3 p.m. and after 5 p.m. ticket options, which are even cheaper and meant for locals.
My point being, that OLC is much more focused on providing a superior experience when Japanese tourists are shelling out for Disney-brand hotels. Japanese tourists are MUCH less likely to rebook an onsite hotel if they had a negative experience.
At WDW, the money comes from: once-in-a-lifetime trips, who likely won't return even if they have a poor experience (in this case, long waits for the monorail and a crowded lobby); infrequent visitors who may come back but likely won't stay at that resort again due to the poor experience, or Disney superfans (DVC/APs) who have deep emotional and financial investment and will more than likely return even if they have one bad experience.
So there is little motivation on the US side to spend money to improve customer experience, until they start seeing a significant slowdown of hotel bookings or guest spending.
OLC's strategy for guest satisfaction is proactive, and WDW's is reactive.