I believe technically that would still be a pharmacy school. Apparently what's now the UCSF School of Pharmacy pioneered masters and doctorate level pharmacy education.
I remember talking to a medical student from Australia who said they used to have more or less an undergraduate medical program, or at least the equivalent of a combination undergraduate and master's degree program for 5-6 years. They call it the Bachelor of Medicine / Bachelor of Surgery degree. I had a doctor who came from a 4-year foreign medical college that wasn't like the US. But apparently there are some programs in Australia that are instituting a separate doctorate-level medical school program.
I certainly understand that this looks bad, but I was under the impression that most of what pharmacists really know was learned on the job. She was legally a pharmacy technician and worked under pharmacists all day for years before claiming to have a pharmacy degree. Certainly a lot of what pharmacists do these days is look up prescribing information along with possible interactions. I could imagine someone pulling this off given enough experience. I'm not saying it's right, but I thought most of what a pharmacist does is oversee the work of technicians.
If you read the articles, she gave the license number of licensed pharmacists with similar names. So they might have checked the database but didn't ask for a license.