Aristomommy
<font color=deeppink>We were in the “wild animals”
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2001
One reason it's allowed is that it takes a very long time to change these types of things and there are good reasons not to, particularly when you consider that for many parents, paying for an extra year of preschool is prohibitive. So what you have, in effect, is a system that benefits parents who can (and will) hold their kids back and that penalizes at least some of the kids in the same age range that will go. There's data to back this up--I'm not just pulling this out my hat. Kids who are on the older range generally do better on standardized tests, at least early on. There's some argument about whether that trend continues throughout their education.
Also, and I don't mean to be argumentative here, but a lot has changed since your kids were in school. If kindergarten was like it was when I was a kid, I'd have sent my son. But it's not.
Schools encourage holding back, because it inflates their achievement scores, at least in elementary school grades. The studies I've read though show that later on, there is little difference. Older kids level off and age appropriate kids "catch up". Just like older kids are often identified gifted in early grades because they have usually had either an extra year of exposure to letters,reading etc. If they are compared to their age group in higher grades, the scores would not be gifted, just proceeding successfully (which is fine). DD is in gifted classes with kids 1-2 years older than her which makes you wonder why these kids were held back and then put in gifted classes? That costs the schools more money than to educate them appropriately.