Since I don't really know what we're disagreeing about I don't know which one of us is being insulting or silly.
1) Do you have any question that I accurately quoted the applicable section of the brochure that's supplied to guests when they check in? I'm insulted if that's your point.
2) Do you have any question that the term "snacks" gives the guests a lot of latitude? I will say a small number of guests seem to be exceeding even a liberal interpretation of that term but most don't.
3) Do you think Disney is entitled to contradict posted policy via emails to those few guests who make an inquiry?
I don't know what we're disagreeing about. Now if the posted policy was silent on the issue we'd something to discuss. Your points are generally logical. I can't see any logical way you can think a private email can contradict posted policy.
I'll agree my PLR analogy might be a reach. Instead just call it "secret" rule. Your email isn't available to the general public and the policy that is available to the general public says the exact opposite.
You can do a check as many current brochures, online or printed, as you want. General restrictions on outside food are long gone.
It is interesting that Disney's rules go so far as to ban torn clothing.
I thought Disney used to have rules against outside food. I don't know if I was mistaken or if Disney changed the rules to allow it.
It's interesting the rules on Disney's website goes so far as to ban torn clothing.
1) Do you have any question that I accurately quoted the applicable section of the brochure that's supplied to guests when they check in? I'm insulted if that's your point.
2) Do you have any question that the term "snacks" gives the guests a lot of latitude? I will say a small number of guests seem to be exceeding even a liberal interpretation of that term but most don't.
3) Do you think Disney is entitled to contradict posted policy via emails to those few guests who make an inquiry?
I don't know what we're disagreeing about. Now if the posted policy was silent on the issue we'd something to discuss. Your points are generally logical. I can't see any logical way you can think a private email can contradict posted policy.
I'll agree my PLR analogy might be a reach. Instead just call it "secret" rule. Your email isn't available to the general public and the policy that is available to the general public says the exact opposite.
You can do a check as many current brochures, online or printed, as you want. General restrictions on outside food are long gone.
It is interesting that Disney's rules go so far as to ban torn clothing.
I thought Disney used to have rules against outside food. I don't know if I was mistaken or if Disney changed the rules to allow it.
It's interesting the rules on Disney's website goes so far as to ban torn clothing.
I think you're just being silly, now Lewis, not to mention insulting. You don't get to talk to me about ethics, when I know that what I'm doing is perfectly ethical. It's a cheap attempt to distract attention away (but from what I don't know). You and I disagree; let's not make it into something nasty.
Let's agree to disagree, and move on. You go on believing that Disney always prints all its policies in the available brochures, and I'll go on believing that Disney often is inconsistent about doing so.