Based on the docs filed, same as now with newer resorts ala RIV. You buy cfw resale that is the only place you can stay.It will be interesting to see how resale restrictions would be applied to properties held in the trust.
But I am buying into the trust, right? At the moment, the trust might be only represented by the cabins, but what happens when the trust includes use of the hotel as outlined in the master document? (The is a statement about envisioned restaurant, hotel and other assets as a multi-use planned project. The statement is highlighted in the other thread on the Ft. Wilderness cabins.)Based on the docs filed, same as now with newer resorts ala RIV. You buy cfw resale that is the only place you can stay.
But I am buying into the trust, right? At the moment, the trust might be only represented by the cabins, but what happens when the trust includes use of the hotel as outlined in the master document? (The is a statement about envisioned restaurant, hotel and other assets as a multi-use planned project. The statement is highlighted in the other thread on the Ft. Wilderness cabins.)
https://www.disboards.com/threads/ft-wilderness-cabins-becoming-dvc.3916819/page-89#post-65244131
Some folks have discussed a two-tier system between the "Legacy 14" and the newer buildings that carry resale restrictions. Some are speculating that a use of a Trust could introduce a third tier, whereby the Trust encompasses more than a single property/resort.
I assume they will continue to operate in the same way where you will have a minimum number of points to qualify.I'm curious how direct benefits will work for trust purchases. Since you are no longer purchasing into DVD direct, is there an exception for purchasing into the trust use plan?
Yeah, I figure they won’t sell it at a reduced price. It just has a “bargain bin” feel to it. Multiple resorts that are not selling well get packaged together. I get the premise and the appeal for DVC management to do this. It makes sense. It just feels like walking down the candy aisle after Halloween and seeing the 4 least selling candies bundled together to entice people to buy them. For me personally, I don’t like those candies so I won’t buy them even when they’re bundled together. Same thing with this trust. It’s not about quantity, it’s about quality. I stay where I want to stay. But I understand that not everyone will feel the same way and this trust will definitely generate revenue for DVC.I'm not too sure they will sell it as a bargain bin. There's a possibility that they would still have a home resort with 11 months access and then tier the rest of the points out (ie 11 for home resort, 9 for the rest in the trust, 7 for all of dvc). This could be an attractive selling point for those that would like advanced priority on multiple resorts, but still provide a tiered selling strategy for disney.
I think many people view the trust that way. If there is an 11, 9 and 7 month split, I would be interested in the trust setup. This could also be advantageous if the resale points continue with the same privilege of 11 and 9 months priority.Yeah, I figure they won’t sell it at a reduced price. It just has a “bargain bin” feel to it. Multiple resorts that are not selling well get packaged together. I get the premise and the appeal for DVC management to do this. It makes sense. It just feels like walking down the candy aisle after Halloween and seeing the 4 least selling candies bundled together to entice people to buy them. For me personally, I don’t like those candies so I won’t buy them even when they’re bundled together. Same thing with this trust. It’s not about quantity, it’s about quality. I stay where I want to stay. But I understand that not everyone will feel the same way and this trust will definitely generate revenue for DVC.
This could also be advantageous if the resale points continue with the same privilege of 11 and 9 months priority.
I could see it happening as your selling your stake in the trust and not just 1 property.Ah yeah, that will never happen.
This would be a selling point to entice more purchases in the trust. There's no downside for Disney to keep this setup, as it allows them to direct sell into the trust at a premium without losing the direct benefits outside of the trust.Ah yeah, that will never happen.
Resale doesn't help disney, but you have to differentiate the trust product in order to get people to buy into the trust. There has to be an incentive to buy that outweighs the negative aspects of the trust.Resale does not help Disney. They are not going to do anything that help resale look better or helps out the resale consumer.
We realize resale does not help Disney.Resale does not help Disney. They are not going to do anything that help resale look better or helps out the resale consumer.
On the resale market I can see the 11 and 9 month windows sticking and obviously the 7 months wouldn't matter as they are limited to what is in the trust only do to restrictions.