Yeah, that's pretty much been me any time I'm running. I need it if I'm going to be walking outside for more than 30 minutes or so, otherwise I burn, but somehow when I'm running I'm faster than the burn-causing raysSunscreen?![]()
Zealios. As good as the old zinc stuff but without the messSo...QOTD: what's your go-to running sunscreen? I tried a Coppertone Sport stick, and it was awful.
Second thisSupergoop makes a lot of different versions -- I like their tinted moisturizer.
The irony here is that I'm pretty strict with the kids about sunscreen when they're younger.....longsleeve rashguards, hats, etc when we go to the beach. I figure I'm just banking as much Vitamin D as I possibly can in the summer months since we have almost no sun from mid-November to March. I also try to avoid peak UV index hours, except for beach days and then I'm obviously going to wear sunscreen. But for a run? I'm usually seeking shade on hot and sunny days so it's a wash imo.Sunscreen?![]()
I think this maybe depends a lot on location and one’s sun sensitivity. Here in FL, I’ve not found ANY SPF to totally prevent my very fair skin from tanning, but using 50SPF results in a light amount of tan, whereas 30SPF results in a whole lot of tan and some burning, and 15SPF may as well be nothing because I’ll burn through it in 20 minutes or less. Up North, I was able to use the lower SPFs just fine, but not down here., I don’t think you gain much extra protection above 15).
Agree, south GA here after growing up in NY. My skin would FRY if I tried using 15.I think this maybe depends a lot on location and one’s sun sensitivity. Here in FL, I’ve not found ANY SPF to totally prevent my very fair skin from tanning, but using 50SPF results in a light amount of tan, whereas 30SPF results in a whole lot of tan and some burning, and 15SPF may as well be nothing because I’ll burn through it in 20 minutes or less. Up North, I was able to use the lower SPFs just fine, but not down here.
I think this maybe depends a lot on location and one’s sun sensitivity. Here in FL, I’ve not found ANY SPF to totally prevent my very fair skin from tanning, but using 50SPF results in a light amount of tan, whereas 30SPF results in a whole lot of tan and some burning, and 15SPF may as well be nothing because I’ll burn through it in 20 minutes or less. Up North, I was able to use the lower SPFs just fine, but not down here.
This is interesting and everyone is different. I will also burn in 15-30 minutes if I don’t wear sunscreen - and my skin pretty much doesn’t tan. I’m either white or burned red.Agree, south GA here after growing up in NY. My skin would FRY if I tried using 15.
No, not rude at all! I’ve seen the data, too, and I believe it - but that small % extra protection seems to make a big difference for me. A hypothesis: maybe adding in the sweat factor makes a difference, too? Perhaps the higher SPF does a better job than a lower SPF with a whole lot of sweat in the mix? I suspect a 15 would be fine for me on a short winter run, when I’m not sweating as much and in the sun less time, vs. a 2-hour run in June, when I’m dripping sweat within 15 minutes and the sun is most intense. I’m unwilling to buy a bunch of different sunscreens to see, though, so 50 it is, year-round lol!This is interesting and everyone is different. I will also burn in 15-30 minutes if I don’t wear sunscreen - and my skin pretty much doesn’t tan. I’m either white or burned red.
I don’t live that much farther north. I grew up in central Oklahoma (now in KS). I have lived at high elevation in the Rocky Mountains (7000+ ft) and worked at a summer camp (outside all the time) in the Austin/San Antonio area of Texas, and 15 has worked for me. I have to make sure I put it on 30 minutes before I go outside.
30 gets 4% more protection than 15 and 50 gets 1% more than 30 (based on a basic, quick google search - so who knows how accurate that is, but it sounds about right from previous research).
ETA: I hope this didn’t come across as rude. I believe each of you - our skin is different and responds differently.
Not rude sounding at all. I wish I could get away with 15! I'm also white or burned red, no tan. Or the freckles on my arms come out enough that from far away it MIGHT appear to be tanThis is interesting and everyone is different. I will also burn in 15-30 minutes if I don’t wear sunscreen - and my skin pretty much doesn’t tan. I’m either white or burned red.
I don’t live that much farther north. I grew up in central Oklahoma (now in KS). I have lived at high elevation in the Rocky Mountains (7000+ ft) and worked at a summer camp (outside all the time) in the Austin/San Antonio area of Texas, and 15 has worked for me. I have to make sure I put it on 30 minutes before I go outside.
30 gets 4% more protection than 15 and 50 gets 1% more than 30 (based on a basic, quick google search - so who knows how accurate that is, but it sounds about right from previous research).
ETA: I hope this didn’t come across as rude. I believe each of you - our skin is different and responds differently.
Same.Not rude sounding at all. I wish I could get away with 15! I'm also white or burned red, no tan. Or the freckles on my arms come out enough that from far away it MIGHT appear to be tan![]()