I'm sorry, I missed where TCPluto said EVERYONE was lying about their kids having asthma. I think he/she said that SOME people lie, some people get doctors to sign off on "mild" cases. Everyone here is probably terribly honest, everyone needing a non-smoking room for medical reasons probably really does have a child who can't stay (or they themselves can't stay) in a smoking room without needing a hospital trip. Lets just grant that not everyone is as honest as we all are.
Furthermore, if it becomes more and more difficult to get a non-smoking room without a doctors note, more and more people who find the odor of stale smoke unpleasant will show up with a doctor's note. If that is how the system is worked, people will work the system.
Last time we had this discussion I postulated that perhaps 10% of the people who require a non-smoking room for medical reasons REALLY need it - they will end up in the hospital without it. 30% should have it - their asthma or allergies might be managed with medication, or it might just make their trip unpleasant, but they'd survive without needing a trip to the ER. The other 60% just don't like the smell of stale smoke and are like me (though we just request NS, we don't request "medical") - I'll sneeze and get stuffed up and won't sleep well, and get headaches but it isn't more than "uncomfortable" (well, the headaches do require some medication). Based on the fact that I get stuffed up and sneeze, I could have my doctor write a perscription for my allergy for a non-smoking room, but I won't. I'd rather save that room for someone whose allergies or asthma can't be managed to a reasonable level.
I do suspect smoking rooms have a limited life at DVC. But I also suspect that will only make the problem more difficult - as DVC won't bother to enforce it. All rooms will be non-smoking, but that just means that the chance a smoker has smoked in your non-smoking room will go up.
Furthermore, if it becomes more and more difficult to get a non-smoking room without a doctors note, more and more people who find the odor of stale smoke unpleasant will show up with a doctor's note. If that is how the system is worked, people will work the system.
Last time we had this discussion I postulated that perhaps 10% of the people who require a non-smoking room for medical reasons REALLY need it - they will end up in the hospital without it. 30% should have it - their asthma or allergies might be managed with medication, or it might just make their trip unpleasant, but they'd survive without needing a trip to the ER. The other 60% just don't like the smell of stale smoke and are like me (though we just request NS, we don't request "medical") - I'll sneeze and get stuffed up and won't sleep well, and get headaches but it isn't more than "uncomfortable" (well, the headaches do require some medication). Based on the fact that I get stuffed up and sneeze, I could have my doctor write a perscription for my allergy for a non-smoking room, but I won't. I'd rather save that room for someone whose allergies or asthma can't be managed to a reasonable level.
I do suspect smoking rooms have a limited life at DVC. But I also suspect that will only make the problem more difficult - as DVC won't bother to enforce it. All rooms will be non-smoking, but that just means that the chance a smoker has smoked in your non-smoking room will go up.