The Yankees are ~7M away from the 210M salary “cap”. They’re 2 time offenders, which means if they were to go over the 210M threshold they would have to pay an additional 105M (50%) in luxury tax.
Can they afford to pay that luxury tax? Yes
Would they still be a profitable franchise if they don’t want to pay it? Yes
Would adding a pitcher, even if it means they go over that salary threshold make the fans happy? Yes
Would adding a pitcher, even if it means they go over that Salary threshold allow the Yankees to continue being a profitable organization? Yes
Does not getting a pitcher, thus not crossing that salary cap threshold mean that the Yankees would be unwilling to spend money on players next year?
No. Actually they’ll be more willing to because they will not be subject to the 50% luxury tax even if they go above the 210M salary cap.
Just because Disney can afford to pay all of these workers, including entertainment. Just because the fans of Disney would be much happier if they brought these entertainment options back. Just because Disney would be profitable with, or without these entertainment options....doesn’t mean they should, or have to bring them back, right now. And it doesn’t mean that they can’t turn around and re-hire these CMs or bring in new ones to fill those entertainment options when they so choose to.
If you were losing 25M dollars a day for over 100 days, you too would be looking at ways to recoup those losses. And when you can’t charge more for the experience, or add paid experiences, you have to find the money elsewhere. It sucks, but those jobs were always going to be where they recouped some losses, and it’s not just Disney, it’s every company. Universal laid off employees too