Pacolovestacos
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2016
Couldn't someone just bring an actual camera or go pro to record the video?
There was a person who Go Pro'd the Star Wars fireworks at DHS..so yeah people do bring those in and because they are smaller I'm sure they are easier to hold for longer periods of time.Couldn't someone just bring an actual camera or go pro to record the video?
Couldn't someone just bring an actual camera or go pro to record the video?
The thing with the artists being upset with it is, why now? The time to have set those standards has long passed IMO.
Put it on your ticket that you don't want video taping (as that appears to be the largest issue) if that's your problem and then kick out the people you see doing that as you see them. You won't get all the people with larger venues but you will get some.
It also doesn't appear to be just a video taping/copyright issue but almost hurt feelings issue where the artist wants people to pay attention to them.
Well I don't like to throw around 'entitled' or 'special snowflakes'. But defiant is sorta strange too but anyways.I think that might be part of the problem. Only getting some. I would think and hope these performers had already asked people to not record their performances. But there are always some who haven't & won't comply. They cause a problem as then others wonder why they should comply with the rules/wishes of the performers when others, who they can clearly see around them, are videoing the performances.
There will be the Entitled, who, just because they are there and have a camera think they have a right to film things, no matter what.
Then there are the Spechul Snowflakes, who very well think others should follow the rules. But the rules don't apply to them.
Then there will be the Defiant people. "You telling me I can't do ___? I'll show YOU."
Then some will do it as a Dare. They want to see if they can get away with it.
And some people get their self-worth & significance from how many Facebook & Twitter followers & likes they receive. So they want to be the only one, or one of the few who get a video of the performance and will post it until they get a cease & desist letter about copyright infringement.
There are probably others. As you can tell, I haven't thought this through very much.![]()
![]()
The truth is artists thrive on publicity. It is usually true that early on in one's career you depend a lot on word of mouth to get yourself recognized. An artist just starting out is less likely (though may still have issues) with having someone take a picture or video tape them. I mean how great would it be if someone saw so and so's video and decided to buy their music or buy a ticket to their concert the next time they were around or go to another city to see it.You and another poster make this sound like a bad, shameful thing.If you created something, even if it was a homemade birthday cake and you were proud of how you frosted it and how it tasted, you'd want the person it was for to pay some attention to it. If you completed a project at work that took a long time and you were pleased with how it came out, wouldn't you'd want your boss & coworkers to recognize your work?
![]()
As mentioned above of course she can request and if she puts on her tickets or the venue has an active policy against cell phone usage then when one is found to be going against that they can be escorted out. But again there are people who go to concerts drunk or high or pay no mind to the actual event going on. Cell phones are not the only thing out there causing one to not be 'present'.But, Adele can't ask a person to please be present and be with her while she's singing in person to them? Maybe she wants people to actually be there for HER and not because she's "famous" and people want to show off they are at an event of a famous person.
And again not every artist is against cell phone usage. Some even request you do so. Are they wrong then for be ok with that? I mean it is still their 'homemade birthday cake'.
Where the heck did I insinuate that? I think you're reading into my comments what you want.Of course it's not wrong if some artists want to be videoed or photographed & posted to social media.
It's also not wrong for some to NOT want to be videoed or photographed as you insinuated, because others do want it.
Except no one has said that. I think everyone has said they would step out to take a call, but they want to be able to be reached. Your 16 year old teen driver is in a car wreck. Do you want them to call you immediately or are you ok with finding out in 2-3 hours?I am somewhat surprised by the people who insist they will take a call during a performance, show or a movie because it might be an emergency. Yes, life is all about you.
That's contradictory for her to do that.I have attended shows where artists ask not to be videoed - Chrissie Hynde comes to mind. Signs on the door of the chicago theater, an announcement beforehand, and the minute she takes the stage, idiots brought their phones out. You just cannot fix stupid. Ushers asked everyone to put their phones away and from what I could see people complied. During the last song, she said people could record her/photograph her.
Back then there were phones everywhere to use. Nowadays not so much. I don’t think you’d have much luck trying to page or call someone at a venue these days. My parents knew where my friends lived and *I* was supposed to check in with *them.* Didn’t always happen and you can be sure there was a price to pay when I didn’t.My first thought was what about an emergency. Then when a poster brought up the fact that we never had cell phones as kids and somehow got by got me thinking how much we rely on cell phones. As kids, we went to school, the mall, movies, out with friends etc. and had no way for our parents to get in contact with us.
If your parents went out to dinner and left you with a sitter, the sitter would have to call the restaurant if they were needed. Also, parents tended to "check in" with the sitter by calling to see if everything was okay before going somewhere like a concert. Really gets you thinking about how attached we are to our phones. Even in jobs, there was not the technology to really work from home, or be available 24/7. You would have a beeper if you were on call.
I don't think this policy would go over well, we are simply too attached to our phones now a days, and we have the expectation of instant access to each other.
Back then there were phones everywhere to use. Nowadays not so much. I don’t think you’d have much luck trying to page or call someone at a venue these days. My parents knew where my friends lived and *I* was supposed to check in with *them.* Didn’t always happen and you can be sure there was a price to pay when I didn’t.
...we are simply too attached to our phones now a days, and we have the expectation of instant access to each other.
My first thought was what about an emergency. Then when a poster brought up the fact that we never had cell phones as kids and somehow got by got me thinking how much we rely on cell phones. As kids, we went to school, the mall, movies, out with friends etc. and had no way for our parents to get in contact with us.
If your parents went out to dinner and left you with a sitter, the sitter would have to call the restaurant if they were needed. Also, parents tended to "check in" with the sitter by calling to see if everything was okay before going somewhere like a concert. Really gets you thinking about how attached we are to our phones. Even in jobs, there was not the technology to really work from home, or be available 24/7. You would have a beeper if you were on call.
I don't think this policy would go over well, we are simply too attached to our phones now a days, and we have the expectation of instant access to each other.
I'm always amazed when people pull out the tired old "but we lived without it before" argument. Yeah, we did. So what? I'm grateful for cell phones and the convenience they give. Why are things that make our lives easier or less stressful automatically bad to some people? Sure, i's a shame that some people misuse them, but that doesn't make the devices inherently evil.