Covid And The Rest of Us

Status
Not open for further replies.
But the issue isn't the U.S NOT allowing Canadian boats, it's the opposite that Canada is not allowing U.S. boats to cross into Canadian territory. But both being discussed in the article are tour boats, they aren't talking about ferry boats. A ferry boat as a means of connecting people from place to place would not be considered recreational (and thus non-essential). The issue being discussed is recreational but the differences with how each country is defining/handling that.

In the article: "Ontario-based tour boat companies — Gananoque Boat Line and Rockport Boat Line — take Canadian passengers on tours multiple times a day along the U.S. side of the St. Lawrence River."
::yes:: EXACTLY!! These are sight-seeing cruises that do not port anywhere; passengers do not get off the boats. It makes absolutely NO sense and is no more a protection against the spread of Covid to Canadians than would be restricting fly-overs throuh our air-space.
 
I hope much clearer information emerges on this very soon because:
a) If we’re dealing with a new strain of virus we’re basically screwed on vaccine development; and
b) There has, prior to now, been no conclusive evidence (or even serious suggestion) that this respiratory disease can be contracted by ingesting contaminated food. The second article itself does downplay the possibility but then circles us back to the idea of Covid origins at the Wuhan wet market.
I don't think that they were saying it was an entirely different strain per se but the Kiwis were able to identify the new outbreak as having characteristics that indicated it had come from somewhere outside of New Zealand.
Also, I didn't get the impression that contaminated food was at fault but maybe the refrigeration units themselves had the virus on their surface and the extreme cold enabled the virus to survive the journey and still be capable of infecting a worker at the receiving plant.

ford family
 
I don't think that they were saying it was an entirely different strain per se but the Kiwis were able to identify the new outbreak as having characteristics that indicated it had come from somewhere outside of New Zealand.
Also, I didn't get the impression that contaminated food was at fault but maybe the refrigeration units themselves had the virus on their surface and the extreme cold enabled the virus to survive the journey and still be capable of infecting a worker at the receiving plant.

ford family
I agree and think it is far more likely that the fact that they were not testing border guards and the people working with returning travellers is the issue. I read that yesterday but today had a very hard time to find any reference as the media loves the more sensationalist headlines about frozen food being the source (one positive person worked in a frozen food store) Let's overlook the more likely scenario and race right to the less likely scenario as that will earn more clicks and reads. :(

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national...esting-of-staff-at-border-extraordinary-skegg
"I was really shocked to hear the Director-General of Health say a week or two ago that they were aiming to test people [border workers] every two or three weeks, every two or three weeks frankly would be quite inadequate.

"But it now turns out that nothing like that was being achieved and I see the reports that more than 60 percent of people working at the border have never been tested."
 
".....I think it is absolutely vital for our elimination status to have the most stringent protections at the border."
He said the virus has clearly been spreading for some time, and New Zealand will be extremely lucky if it has not spread outside Auckland.
Skegg said New Zealand has beaten Covid before and we can do it again but it is important to learn from the mistakes."

I wonder what the long term goals are, to keep to elimination and "beat" the virus? I wonder how sustainable NZ is to keep itself completely dis attached to the world. This is what seems scary more than a virus.

Imagine if the US took this stance with the goal to stay covid free with such stiff measures. No more flights from anyone but US citizens, ability to lock down whole cities or states from the president, goal to stay self contained until the virus is not longer a threat. I know some think that is exactly what the US should have done....who gets to make the judgement?

It is fact what Honduras and many other poor nations have done seeing no other options, but to devastating consequences. Are people without food and medical care in NZ, I have not heard anything of the sort. But here....

Who can say what is good or right or bad or wrong? Everything is so gray and fuzzy.
 
I wonder what the long term goals are, to keep to elimination and "beat" the virus? I wonder how sustainable NZ is to keep itself completely dis attached to the world. This is what seems scary more than a virus.
...


It is fact what Honduras and many other poor nations have done seeing no other options, but to devastating consequences. Are people without food and medical care in NZ, I have not heard anything of the sort. But here....

Who can say what is good or right or bad or wrong? Everything is so gray and fuzzy.
I so agree with you and this is what made me angry about the situation when more privileged countries started to do this, apparently then setting a standard for virus control. Back in December, there was horror when China started to quarantine people, including apparently locking them into buildings. But is what is happening now much better? We may not be locking people into buildings, but we are keeping people forcibly separated. Even on this thread there are posters who are apparently ok with this because they are not impacted. I am NOT ok with this. It may be my experience with the DDR (former 'East Germany') but even then travel to other countries was permitted.

It's like one country did this and the rest followed. Vietnam was mostly self-sufficient, and is expected to have less economic impact. Most of their tourism is national, they have a robust manufacturing and food production, they have a strong social network, etc. Most countries cannot do that, and I suspect not even New Zealand in the long run.

There was also a faint tone of 'smugness' that they conquered the virus in NZ. Now I am reading things where they are telling people not to shame people with the virus. That attitude just seems so unhealthy and unrealistic that they could really expect zero transmission. “There is no blame or shame in having Covid-19… " is a quote from a health minister, and I see that caution in several articles.

Interestingly as well, it appears that the Melbourne outbreak may not have been started by the security workers having sex at the quarantine hotel (although they did spread it). Apparently the night manager was patient zero at the quarantine hotel.
 
(Apologies, I feel like I am saying a lot but I have a lot to say...)

Also keep in mind that 'quarantine' varies from country to country. In Singapore it was 5 star hotels, in Melbourne there are some nice and some not so nice hotels. In Hong Kong they started with electronic bracelets like prisoners have, but moved to quarantining people in 'camps' outside the main parts of the city which were similar to TB hospitals. I have direct experience with someone being sent there, after she was told to quarantine at home. It's an awful story from a normally somewhat privileged, civilized society.

I did speak with a friend yesterday who runs an NGO in Africa, and she affirmed my concerns about the schools for girls in Africa. She's also hearing so many stories from her contacts in South Africa about how domestic violence and physical violence in general due to the ban on alcohol. Hospitals are apparently full, but not just with COVID but due to this violence. This is occurring across the continent. Poverty, combined with job losses, no prospects for work in future, closed schools until 2021 (often residential schools), ban on alcohol, etc are all fuelling this.
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/african-women-face-pandemics-200729132154433.html
 
I so agree with you and this is what made me angry about the situation when more privileged countries started to do this, apparently then setting a standard for virus control. Back in December, there was horror when China started to quarantine people, including apparently locking them into buildings. But is what is happening now much better? We may not be locking people into buildings, but we are keeping people forcibly separated. Even on this thread there are posters who are apparently ok with this because they are not impacted. I am NOT ok with this. It may be my experience with the DDR (former 'East Germany') but even then travel to other countries was permitted.

It's like one country did this and the rest followed. Vietnam was mostly self-sufficient, and is expected to have less economic impact. Most of their tourism is national, they have a robust manufacturing and food production, they have a strong social network, etc. Most countries cannot do that, and I suspect not even New Zealand in the long run.

There was also a faint tone of 'smugness' that they conquered the virus in NZ. Now I am reading things where they are telling people not to shame people with the virus. That attitude just seems so unhealthy and unrealistic that they could really expect zero transmission. “There is no blame or shame in having Covid-19… " is a quote from a health minister, and I see that caution in several articles.

Interestingly as well, it appears that the Melbourne outbreak may not have been started by the security workers having sex at the quarantine hotel (although they did spread it). Apparently the night manager was patient zero at the quarantine hotel.
They have extended the border closure for Canada/US til end of September now. To add on to your post, yes it sucks these smaller countries that rely on tourism are hurting and I feel bad for them. No one has an answer on how to reopen their borders without the worry of cases getting out of control again.
 
::yes:: EXACTLY!! These are sight-seeing cruises that do not port anywhere; passengers do not get off the boats. It makes absolutely NO sense and is no more a protection against the spread of Covid to Canadians than would be restricting fly-overs throuh our air-space.

I suspect that one of the reasons Canadian ships are allowed to go through American waters and the opposite is not allowed has to do with the amount of reports of US citizens not following our travel restrictions. I have read many articles and reports of US citizens being up here when they are not supposed to be but I must have missed all the ones about Canadians doing the same in the States.
 
They have extended the border closure for Canada/US til end of September now. To add on to your post, yes it sucks these smaller countries that rely on tourism are hurting and I feel bad for them. No one has an answer on how to reopen their borders without the worry of cases getting out of control again.
But should that be the end goal or only goal? Many of these countries deal with other deadly issues like yellow fever, ebola, malaria, etc. I realise that most here don't travel like that but I've been in many places where there was a yellow fever epidemic, for instance.

Today you can get on a plane and fly to Kenya, or Tanzania, and take a holiday which would provide income to many people. When you returned to Canada, you would quarantine for 14 days. So the risk of you bringing something back is small. Of course, you may catch COVID on the plane there, or whilst there, but the rate of transmission reported (if to be trusted) are relatively low, and most people spend most time outdoors in those locations when on holiday.

This is what the poster in Honduras means about evaluating risk. We need to step back and determine if COVID should be the main risk right now, or if there are other serious risks which should help to drive decisions. Unfortunately, for most privileged countries, COVID transmission remains the primary risk, even above the social and economic impacts.

Again, no easy answers, but we need to have these discussions.
 
I suspect that one of the reasons Canadian ships are allowed to go through American waters and the opposite is not allowed has to do with the amount of reports of US citizens not following our travel restrictions. I have read many articles and reports of US citizens being up here when they are not supposed to be but I must have missed all the ones about Canadians doing the same in the States.
Did you read the article the PP posted because it doesn't feel like you're talking about what's actually being discussed :flower3: In the article the tour boats aren't stopping on the waters, they aren't docking on the U.S. side. There's no opportunities for Americans to go on Canadian soil same as Canadians to go on U.S. soil; least not the way that is being discussed. It's about boundary lines within the waters.

No one is saying there's aren't Americans going where they shouldn't be going. But this situation such that is being talked about isn't that. It's about the concern over spreading COVID when people aren't even getting off the boat and are just crossing the boundary line of countries within the waters.

ETA: It's the semantics part of my earlier comment coming into play. Recreational travel is still prohibited between the countries. The boat company being spoken about in the article was considered a commercial vessel and thus able to go into the U.S. waters by CBP so long as it didn't stop. The U.S. tour companies' point was these are Canadian tour boats that are taking people on tours so their activities were recreational even whilst their boat was considered commercial. It's like a loophole here.
 
Last edited:
I suspect that one of the reasons Canadian ships are allowed to go through American waters and the opposite is not allowed has to do with the amount of reports of US citizens not following our travel restrictions. I have read many articles and reports of US citizens being up here when they are not supposed to be but I must have missed all the ones about Canadians doing the same in the States.
Sure, that's possible but so are case-by-case waivers, which can and should be issued for these American boat tours. Unless the passengers jump off and swim for it, there's little risk of them breaking any rules. While I am ALL FOR the thoughtful protection of national interests, we also need to remember we are not enemies. I actually HATE the idea that Covid-related travel restrictions might be treated as matters of diplomacy and/or foreign relations instead of simple practicalities.
 
Sure, that's possible but so are case-by-case waivers, which can and should be issued for these American boat tours. Unless the passengers jump off and swim for it, there's little risk of them breaking any rules. While I am ALL FOR the thoughtful protection of national interests, we also need to remember we are not enemies. I actually HATE the idea that Covid-related travel restrictions might be treated as matters of diplomacy and/or foreign relations instead of simple practicalities.

Case by case waivers could be a good solution to the issue for sure but until all of the details can be ironed out, we have to stick with blanket restrictions.

As for not being enemies, I wish *everyone* would remember this but sadly there are some in power who do not and who seem to use diplomatic issues as leverage.

Did you read the article the PP posted because it doesn't feel like you're talking about what's actually being discussed :flower3: In the article the tour boats aren't stopping on the waters, they aren't docking on the U.S. side. There's no opportunities for Americans to go on Canadian soil same as Canadians to go on U.S. soil; least not the way that is being discussed. It's about boundary lines within the waters.

No one is saying there's aren't Americans going where they shouldn't be going. But this situation such that is being talked about isn't that. It's about the concern over spreading COVID when people aren't even getting off the boat and are just crossing the boundary line of countries within the waters.

ETA: It's the semantics part of my earlier comment coming into play. Recreational travel is still prohibited between the countries. The boat company being spoken about in the article was considered a commercial vessel and thus able to go into the U.S. waters by CBP so long as it didn't stop. The U.S. tour companies' point was these are Canadian tour boats that are taking people on tours so their activities were recreational even whilst their boat was considered commercial. It's like a loophole here.

I absolutely did read the article but it all comes down to the fact that Canada can decide what rules it wants to set out in relation to the Canadian border and America can decide what rules it wants to set our for their border.

Fair or not, right or wrong, logical or illogical. Canada has taken a very strong stance on our border closure and that has included not allowing US tour boats into our waters.

Do I really think that tourists are going to jump overboard and swim to our shores? Of course not, at least not many but I do think that there could be a fairly strong possibility (based on American tourists lying about their trips to, say, Banff) of some tour operators saying they will not land on Canadian soil but doing so anyways.
 
I absolutely did read the article but it all comes down to the fact that Canada can decide what rules it wants to set out in relation to the Canadian border and America can decide what rules it wants to set our for their border.

Fair or not, right or wrong, logical or illogical. Canada has taken a very strong stance on our border closure and that has included not allowing US tour boats into our waters.

Do I really think that tourists are going to jump overboard and swim to our shores? Of course not, at least not many but I do think that there could be a fairly strong possibility (based on American tourists lying about their trips to, say, Banff) of some tour operators saying they will not land on Canadian soil but doing so anyways.
You kinda seem defensive about Canada with all due respect and I really don't mean that rudely. I know this thread is designed for those mostly outside the U.S and have appreciated hearing different ways. I would have never heard of this story I think unless I saw it on this thread but it's an interesting one none the less.

No where in my comments have I said Canada can't do what they please. I don't even have a dog in this fight living in the Midwest. But impartially (meaning I'm not speaking as an American) I can see where this is not making the most sense. The fact that a fellow Canadian of yours can do the same speaks volumes to me :) And as delicately as I can say those who are on those tour boats are participating in leisure/recreational activities across our borders..which is the very thing you say Canada has taken a strong stance against the U.S. for.

It wouldn't matter if it was the U.S. doing this to Canada I'd feel the same way. It's not about a particular allegiance to a particular country.
 
There was also a faint tone of 'smugness' that they conquered the virus in NZ. Now I am reading things where they are telling people not to shame people with the virus. That attitude just seems so unhealthy and unrealistic that they could really expect zero transmission. “There is no blame or shame in having Covid-19… " is a quote from a health minister, and I see that caution in several articles.
Here since day one, all government announcements carried the line that we are not to shame anyone who tests positive. BUT the governor here said many times we should shame people into mask wearing and staying home so....

Hospitals are apparently full, but not just with COVID but due to this violence. This is occurring across the continent. Poverty, combined with job losses, no prospects for work in future, closed schools until 2021 (often residential schools), ban on alcohol, etc are all fuelling this.
Violent crime is WAY up here. Two last night, 4 armed men entered and robbed families. Same fuel it sounds as other places. They did lift the ban on alcohol here that was in place the first month.
 
Here since day one, all government announcements carried the line that we are not to shame anyone who tests positive. BUT the governor here said many times we should shame people into mask wearing and staying home so....


Violent crime is WAY up here. Two last night, 4 armed men entered and robbed families. Same fuel it sounds as other places. They did lift the ban on alcohol here that was in place the first month.
It's my understanding the Honduras is an extremely violent and dangerous country at the best of times. The Canadian government has an official Travel Advisory in place for more than a decade. What, in general, is the reason for the high rates of violent crime, in your opinion? Are temporary residents such as yourselves safe? :flower3:
 
It's my understanding the Honduras is an extremely violent and dangerous country at the best of times. The Canadian government has an official Travel Advisory in place for more than a decade. What, in general, is the reason for the high rates of violent crime, in your opinion? Are temporary residents such as yourselves safe? :flower3:
About 10 years ago was way worse, lots of cartel and drug related issues. In the big cities there are still war taxes and lots of issues of gang crime on locals. For the most part if you are not in the middle of that, it has not been a big issue. Mostly pick pockets and stuff taken if you left your car unlocked. Tourists were very rarely targeted or experienced violent crime. But nationals, deal with a lot. Lots of violent crime against women and kidnapping of people with businesses. The current situation is leading to lots of violent crime with those with guns on locals and expats for the sake of stealing cash and electronics and more guns.
I feel pretty safe. but we have armed guards in our community and have the means to stop anyone who would enter our home.
 
About 10 years ago was way worse, lots of cartel and drug related issues. In the big cities there are still war taxes and lots of issues of gang crime on locals. For the most part if you are not in the middle of that, it has not been a big issue. Mostly pick pockets and stuff taken if you left your car unlocked. Tourists were very rarely targeted or experienced violent crime. But nationals, deal with a lot. Lots of violent crime against women and kidnapping of people with businesses. The current situation is leading to lots of violent crime with those with guns on locals and expats for the sake of stealing cash and electronics and more guns.
I feel pretty safe. but we have armed guards in our community and have the means to stop anyone who would enter our home.
It sounds like something out of a movie, but I've know quite a few people who have gone to work different places overseas and lived in those closed compounds. In the Middle East especially, it's just a different kind of lock-down, I guess.
 
It sounds like something out of a movie, but I've know quite a few people who have gone to work different places overseas and lived in those closed compounds. In the Middle East especially, it's just a different kind of lock-down, I guess.
There are no walls, people can walk down the beach and enter or walk through the forest from the road. Its a resort community and armed guards are just the norm in this part of the world.
 
There are no walls, people can walk down the beach and enter or walk through the forest from the road. Its a resort community and armed guards are just the norm in this part of the world.
You don't have to answer, of course, but may I ask how you ended up living in Honduras?
 
There are no walls, people can walk down the beach and enter or walk through the forest from the road. Its a resort community and armed guards are just the norm in this part of the world.
It's not Honduras but my husband's company was building a power plant in Mexico he was not on it but knew some people who were working on it. Where it was located at a wall had to be built around it first to protect it then the engineers and construction workers were sent down to start on the power plant and armed guards were commonplace. That particular area they were under strict orders not to travel outside a specified zone. These types of things were something I hadn't even considered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top