I've been mulling over this issue for quite some time, but after our latest visit in December, I've decided that the dining plan is not worth it. I've had multiple visits with and without the plan, and the final tally always has shown that the financial difference is negligible. However, this latest trip proved that the dining plan is not flexible enough for us and, quite frankly, took a lot of the fun out of the trip. So here's a list of why I don't like it:
1. We typically eat table service each night, but on this particular trip we felt locked in to our ADRs because of the dining plan. If we had been paying OOP, we probably would've canceled one or two of our ADRs and eaten more simply.
2. At some signature restaurants, I would rather have an appetizer and a salad, not an entree.
3. With a few exceptions, the desserts that are included in the counter-service meals are not worth the calories. I would rather have a salad at lunch and grab a decadent dessert somewhere else. (And fellow Disneyholics know where the best desserts are!)
4. If I have an entree at a signature restaurant, I typically do not have "room" for dessert. Also, I'd rather have water with my dinner. The beverage/dinner/dessert table-service credit doesn't work for me.
5. I learned on previous trips to not even order beverages and desserts for table service if I don't want them. Otherwise, I'm paying extra in tips.
6. Too much time is spent negotiating with the other members of the traveling
Are you going to use your counter service? Can I take your snack credit? Should we try to split a table-service credit? I have enough negotiation and stress in the real world. I don't need it on vacation.
7. It doesn't save money for me, especially since the "free" dining requires paying rack rate for the hotel room.
8. Since the DDP doesn't fit my eating style, I ended up spending extra dollars on what I do want to eat or drink.
So, in the future, I plan to wait for a room discount and pay OOP for food and drink. No more DDP for us.