I didn't. I've been to WDW a lot in the last few years but this was an Orlando trip, so we rented a house in Winter Park and hung out with my family a bunch. We agreed to go to one theme park for a day and we chose US, mostly because my wife is mad at Disney these days. And the kids have read harry Potter and we figured what the hell. And it was a good day; please forgive me if I implied otherwise. Theme parks require waiting, always have, always will.
I only mention what I mention because I feel there's been a lot of over-the-top of praise for US and IOA in comparison to WDW. EP is praised a lot, and I paid the money for it thinking that praise would have it be walk-ons for most of the rides (I knew HP was excluded), so I was disappointed with the amount of time we spent waiting for the kids to get off a ride. That said, seeing the standby lines and the fact it was a hot March day (at least for Colorado mountain wimpy kids), I was glad we spent the money, even if it was less than I expected it to be. And that was my feeling with all of Universal Studios, and the same way I felt about IOA a couple of years ago. it's a very nice theme park. But it feels mashed together -- as things have been added on, they don't always seem to fit exactly. I think a lot of things there are very nice, but there's no real cohesion. Minons across the street from Shrek, a half block down from a straight-fall rollercoaster, and then onto Hollywood Boulevard and a collection of shops and restaurants.
The only thing that was immersive on both sides was Harry Potter, and it was that. But I also felt it was overkill -- a lot of real estate for one ride and one concept, almost like a ren faire with cooler stuff.
As for FP+, I think it's fine. I think it was the only way for WDW to equalize opportunity at MK, and they just implemented it everywhere else because they'd already done it there. I don't know whether its preferable to EP or not, but it is free, and that ought to count for something in WDW's favor.
I only mention what I mention because I feel there's been a lot of over-the-top of praise for US and IOA in comparison to WDW. EP is praised a lot, and I paid the money for it thinking that praise would have it be walk-ons for most of the rides (I knew HP was excluded), so I was disappointed with the amount of time we spent waiting for the kids to get off a ride. That said, seeing the standby lines and the fact it was a hot March day (at least for Colorado mountain wimpy kids), I was glad we spent the money, even if it was less than I expected it to be. And that was my feeling with all of Universal Studios, and the same way I felt about IOA a couple of years ago. it's a very nice theme park. But it feels mashed together -- as things have been added on, they don't always seem to fit exactly. I think a lot of things there are very nice, but there's no real cohesion. Minons across the street from Shrek, a half block down from a straight-fall rollercoaster, and then onto Hollywood Boulevard and a collection of shops and restaurants.
The only thing that was immersive on both sides was Harry Potter, and it was that. But I also felt it was overkill -- a lot of real estate for one ride and one concept, almost like a ren faire with cooler stuff.
As for FP+, I think it's fine. I think it was the only way for WDW to equalize opportunity at MK, and they just implemented it everywhere else because they'd already done it there. I don't know whether its preferable to EP or not, but it is free, and that ought to count for something in WDW's favor.