Ms Bibbidi
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2022
- Messages
- 1,246
A thread for annual passes at Disney World in Florida.
You were too quick!What about them?
MillauFr, I have noticed your posts on this on different threads. That is certainly a fair economic theory. Of course, Disney might face some bad press if they did that so it has complications.The Disneyland AP debacle is just another example on how Disney seems unwilling to price their product at a level where demand and supply are in balance.
I think all of the annual passes as they are currently structured are inequitable and unfair for most park guests. Disney seems obligated to offer them due to inertia. A few park guests that are heavy users are getting an extremely good deal. Other guests that are going for a once in a lifetime trip are getting ripped off. In a perfect world these inequities would be balanced out a bit more. Of course Disney is a private corporation and has no obligation other than worrying about public reaction to care.MillauFr, I have noticed your posts on this on different threads. That is certainly a fair economic theory. Of course, Disney might face some bad press if they did that so it has complications.
I am curious, just for fun, what do you think that price point would be for a parkhopper annual pass that includes parking and discounts but no add-ons? Say a Sorcerer pass. At what point would it not sell-out but stay below their cap. Let's say the cap is about 500,000 passholders about evenly divided among the 4 types of passes.
Well, Christine McCarthy, CFO has talked about "flexibility" for Disney. It is likely some changes are in the works. Thanks for the response, MillauFr.I think all of the annual passes as they are currently structured are inequitable and unfair for most park guests. Disney seems obligated to offer them due to inertia. A few park guests that are heavy users are getting an extremely good deal. Other guests that are going for a once in a lifetime trip are getting ripped off. In a perfect world these inequities would be balanced out a bit more. Of course Disney is a private corporation and has no obligation other than worrying about public reaction to care.
So, make sure I have this right please.I just renewed our December 4 expiration dvc sorcerer passes. I was on the fence as there’s a chance we’ll not use. In the past if an ap renewal was not activated prior to expiration, I could pay difference and use it towards a subsequent year new AP. I was told that the new pass renewal doesn’t need in person activation and will just roll over to the new year when old pass expires. If not used during the year, it automatically expires unused. No more parking it to reactivate towards a new ap a year later if plans change. Will be thousands of wasted $ if we can’t get to wdw next year. A little frustrated with such strict rules. We had two trips we had to cancel at the last moment this year because someone in our party got COVID. Thankfully the Airlines have been much more flexible but dvc points and ap’s potentially go to waste when following their rules on not visiting the parks sick.
I'm not sure what you are even saying .... it sounds like you think there should be no Annual Passes just because there are people coming who would not or could not buy them. Annual Passes exist because they are good for Disney.I think all of the annual passes as they are currently structured are inequitable and unfair for most park guests. Disney seems obligated to offer them due to inertia. A few park guests that are heavy users are getting an extremely good deal. Other guests that are going for a once in a lifetime trip are getting ripped off. In a perfect world these inequities would be balanced out a bit more. Of course Disney is a private corporation and has no obligation other than worrying about public reaction to care.
I just don't understand why Disney continues to miscalculate the value that the annual passes have to some guests. It is a private company and as such would attempt to extract as much money as they can from guests that show up at the parks 40+ times per year. The current pricing structure does nothing to discourage heavy use of the pass.I'm not sure what you are even saying .... it sounds like you think there should be no Annual Passes just because there are people coming who would not or could not buy them. Annual Passes exist because they are good for Disney.
It's up to the guests to get their money's worth. I have never thought it was worth it for our of state guests as unless you multiple times a year you would rarely get your money's worth.I think all of the annual passes as they are currently structured are inequitable and unfair for most park guests. Disney seems obligated to offer them due to inertia. A few park guests that are heavy users are getting an extremely good deal. Other guests that are going for a once in a lifetime trip are getting ripped off. In a perfect world these inequities would be balanced out a bit more. Of course Disney is a private corporation and has no obligation other than worrying about public reaction to care.
Sorry. Hard to articulate the specifics. From what I’ve experienced the second part of your reply is correct.So, make sure I have this right please.
A "new" AP that never has a "first use" but is more than a year from the purchase date cannot be activated as an annual pass, but the passholder can get the value of it applied towards a new pass (if they are for sale) and pay the difference.
A renewed AP (would automatically begin at the end of the old pass) that goes more than 30 days beyond the expiration (so it can no longer be renewed) then it just expires and the holder no longer has passholder status.
It's up to the guests to get their money's worth. I have never thought it was worth it for our of state guests as unless you multiple times a year you would rarely get your money's worth.