I flip flop on this in my head. I'm trying to picture the sales pitch.
If they go with only building the minimum necessary (we can all argue on what that may or may not be), which I think will be standard DVC rooms, give it a view, add a QS, and a quiet pool, they would have to price them at 60 points a week. This gives it a buy in of about $3k less than SSR or OKW. The biggest selling factor will be the price, and points necessary for use. I think price and point allotment necessary will drive occupancy on its own. On the flip of this thought, however, is the thought, was $3000 the difference in making or losing a DVC sale? Is there a segment that would buy if the price was just $3000 lower, and yearly dues $100 less? Enough of a segment that they would build a resort to cater to it?
I don't know if having a 60 pt/wk property would have that much of an adverse affect on the system. It could add these much sought after value rooms. I don't see it detracting from the Poly or GF, they were never looking at CBR in the first place. If anything, it adds value to those properties. "Look what you get for 15 points a night!"
Perhaps its worth it for them to spend exponential more dollars to get it up to the 15point/75 point per week level. Perhaps they think they could fill it either way?
I'm not sure how much building room they have, but pp's maybe right. A new regular DVC in line with boardwalk. Separate from CBR.
On another note, didn't CBR just get a renovation? Or perhaps that was just for certain sections.