Disney Information Station Logo

Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Just for Fun > Community Board
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 02-09-2013, 03:32 PM   #1156
Uncle Remus
Raconteur
can't name 'em Jeb, George, and Barbara, these are GOOD dogs!
 
Uncle Remus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,543

These two YouTube users seem to have the best uploads of the trial in case any of you want to catch up with the testimony.

tawnidilly

croakerqueen123
__________________
Uncle Remus is offline  
Old 02-10-2013, 08:07 PM   #1157
MaryAnnDVC
"Mare", DISing since '99; prefers being tagless
 
MaryAnnDVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: RGBBLA
Posts: 15,424

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Remus View Post
These two YouTube users seem to have the best uploads of the trial in case any of you want to catch up with the testimony.

tawnidilly

croakerqueen123
Awesome! Those are First Post worthy!

Do you folks who watched the Casey Anthony trial remember hearing that the defense attorneys had a team of people perusing social media for comments about the trial and its players? And determined that people thought George was "creepy" (why, I don't know...I never thought he was!) and they played that idea up? I wonder how much that might figure in to this trial, on either side, and how much in general in trials these days. Like, did the defense know about that Cameron Diaz scene where she's dancing in Spiderman underwear? Do they now know because it was brought up on TV and probably tweets/online? Did the prosecutor know? Does HE know now because of social media?

Anyway...everyone get a good night's sleep; it's hard enough to stay awake during this questioning. I bet it will be easy to stay awake for the cross-examination! '

One more thing...about that Nurni (sp?) guy saying "I'm confused..." I interpreted that to mean that what JA was saying might be something the jury would be confused about, and he's just asking her to further explain, so that supposedly the jury will "get it". I think it's a style of questioning, not that what she's saying isn't what he expected her to say.
__________________
MaryAnnDVC is offline  
|
The DIS
Register to remove

Join Date: 1997
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,000,000
Old 02-10-2013, 08:12 PM   #1158
Dee77
DIS Veteran
 
Dee77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 2,217

Has anyone else read the leaked "bombshell" that will be brought out in court this week??? Be forewarned it is IMHO a truly disgusting, last ditch effort to try to get this girl acquitted.

It basically says that Jodi will discuss finding Travis during "alleged lewd acts while looking at pictures of young children" I swear this girl is pure evil.
__________________



Nov 2008 SSR Studio, Dec 2009 OKW 2 Bedroom, Nov/Dec 2010 SSR 2 Bedroom, May 2011 BCV 1 Bedroom, Nov 2011 OKW 2 Bedroom,
Aug 2012 OKW 2 Bedroom, Aug 2013 OKW 1 Bedroom, Jan/Feb 2014 SSR 1 Bedroom, Aug 2014 OKW 2 Bedroom, Aug 2015 OKW 3 Bedroom GV
Dee77 is offline  
Old 02-10-2013, 08:35 PM   #1159
MaryAnnDVC
"Mare", DISing since '99; prefers being tagless
 
MaryAnnDVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: RGBBLA
Posts: 15,424

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee77 View Post
Has anyone else read the leaked "bombshell" that will be brought out in court this week??? Be forewarned it is IMHO a truly disgusting, last ditch effort to try to get this girl acquitted.

It basically says that Jodi will discuss finding Travis during "alleged lewd acts while looking at pictures of young children" I swear this girl is pure evil.
Haven't heard that, but where were the pictures? Supposedly they weren't on HIS computer. Maybe they're on HER computer.

But let's say that's true...why didn't she walk out on him whenever it was she found him doing that?? He's not on trial! It doesn't matter how bad Travis might have been about anything...she knew what he was like from the beginning (no "grooming" on his part involved!), she never said NO, and she chased after him...she went back for more over and over and over again. This is BS, trying to distract the jury from the actual facts of THIS case...that she premeditated and carried out his murder. Ugh, I can't wait for this trial to be over; it's bugging the crap out of me thinking that jury might be getting caught up in this smokescreen.
__________________
MaryAnnDVC is offline  
Old 02-10-2013, 08:45 PM   #1160
kidshop
DIS Veteran
 
kidshop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,998

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee77 View Post
Has anyone else read the leaked "bombshell" that will be brought out in court this week??? Be forewarned it is IMHO a truly disgusting, last ditch effort to try to get this girl acquitted.

It basically says that Jodi will discuss finding Travis during "alleged lewd acts while looking at pictures of young children" I swear this girl is pure evil.

Yeah. It's going to be really bad. I'm not sure why this is being allowed. She can just say anything with no proof.

But, there was no porn on Travis' computer, we already know that. And I thought he liked young girls (the 12 year old girl alleged comment on the yet unheard sex tape) and the pigtails, but now it's boys!!!???

It's not true and I am confident the jury will see Jodi for the lying liar she is.

Still doesn't explain why she slaughtered Travis while he was showering. It won't get her off.

I don't think I can watch her say that though. She is evil. god bless Travis' family. May they have the strength to get through the next few days.
kidshop is offline  
Old 02-10-2013, 09:11 PM   #1161
Dee77
DIS Veteran
 
Dee77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 2,217

I have watched some of the analysis on Nancy Grace and HLN etc and it seems like the general consensus is that the judge is allowing her rambling on and on due to the fact that it is a death penalty case, the judge does not want there to be any appearance of limited areas of defense that can be used in an appeal case to overturn a guilty verdict in this case.

As for why the prosecutor is letting her go on and on without objecting, some people think he doesn't want to have the jury think he is worried about what she is saying or that too much objecting can turn off people/juries. Other people say it is just that he is letting her talk and talk to catch her in more stuff she can hang herself with.


Bring on cross examination is all I can say..
__________________



Nov 2008 SSR Studio, Dec 2009 OKW 2 Bedroom, Nov/Dec 2010 SSR 2 Bedroom, May 2011 BCV 1 Bedroom, Nov 2011 OKW 2 Bedroom,
Aug 2012 OKW 2 Bedroom, Aug 2013 OKW 1 Bedroom, Jan/Feb 2014 SSR 1 Bedroom, Aug 2014 OKW 2 Bedroom, Aug 2015 OKW 3 Bedroom GV
Dee77 is offline  
Old 02-10-2013, 09:15 PM   #1162
Promomx2
DIS Veteran
 
Promomx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: va.
Posts: 3,115

I think if she says that about Travis, his two sisters are gonna freak and jump over that half wall in the courtroom.
Promomx2 is offline  
Old 02-10-2013, 10:40 PM   #1163
usnuzuloose

Loosing Doomed Boo Boo
 
usnuzuloose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 129,042

Problem is if she claims he was looking at child porn, how can you prove that? There is nothing on his computer. Hmmm.....could it be on hers? They tried to pass that off the first round and that did not fly. Came out it was her computer. I haven't heard that though. I really have not viewed those you tube videos. It has been a rough weekend. The more she talks, the more she backs herself in the corner with the prosecution questioning coming. I don't know if she is thinking about that. Jaun is pretty smart, he will know how to come back at her, just like all the other witness's.
__________________
A Carnival cruise.....with a chicken. TR
http://www.disboards.com/showthread....54201&posted=1
usnuzuloose is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 08:02 AM   #1164
lorimay
DIS Veteran
 
lorimay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,703

ARe you Kidding me?!?!
How is this going to be allowed in??

Isn't that "hearsay"???
There was nothing on the computer to prove this?

OMG! This is one unbelievable case.

I hope this jury is smarter than this.
lorimay is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 08:06 AM   #1165
Uncle Remus
Raconteur
can't name 'em Jeb, George, and Barbara, these are GOOD dogs!
 
Uncle Remus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,543

So Jodi's whole family including her dad who is on dialysis will be in the court room today.

And Thurs there was a hearing, the prosecution was trying to keep some evidence from being admitted, the defense won so maybe we'll see that today.
__________________
Uncle Remus is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 08:09 AM   #1166
MaryAnnDVC
"Mare", DISing since '99; prefers being tagless
 
MaryAnnDVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: RGBBLA
Posts: 15,424

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee77 View Post
I have watched some of the analysis on Nancy Grace and HLN etc and it seems like the general consensus is that the judge is allowing her rambling on and on due to the fact that it is a death penalty case, the judge does not want there to be any appearance of limited areas of defense that can be used in an appeal case to overturn a guilty verdict in this case.

As for why the prosecutor is letting her go on and on without objecting, some people think he doesn't want to have the jury think he is worried about what she is saying or that too much objecting can turn off people/juries. Other people say it is just that he is letting her talk and talk to catch her in more stuff she can hang herself with.

Bring on cross examination is all I can say..
Makes sense.

Just said on InSession that JA's father, brother and I'm not sure who else is going to be in court today. Her father is on dialysis.
__________________
MaryAnnDVC is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 09:34 AM   #1167
usnuzuloose

Loosing Doomed Boo Boo
 
usnuzuloose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 129,042

Good morning everyone. I will be missing a little bit today. I have an appointment this morning.
__________________
A Carnival cruise.....with a chicken. TR
http://www.disboards.com/showthread....54201&posted=1
usnuzuloose is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 09:43 AM   #1168
a1tinkfans
Spreading Some Pixie Dust Today!
 
a1tinkfans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,933

Hey All
What a weekend..
swamped with snow and now ICY rain UGH...
good day for tv .............Drama
__________________
Where Dreams Come True
a1tinkfans is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 09:50 AM   #1169
momrek06
The first person to reply on any thread needs to quote the OPShell Smuggler!
BEE FRAGMENTS??? I do NOT eat bees!!
 
momrek06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 22,320

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Remus View Post
These two YouTube users seem to have the best uploads of the trial in case any of you want to catch up with the testimony.

tawnidilly

croakerqueen123
WOW, UR, these are great! Thanks for sharing.

Good Morning, everyone. I have appts this morn but hope to read here and check some of the testimony later on.
__________________





KAR

momrek06 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 10:24 AM   #1170
MaryAnnDVC
"Mare", DISing since '99; prefers being tagless
 
MaryAnnDVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: RGBBLA
Posts: 15,424

Re: the behind closed doors meeting on Thursday:

The judge WILL allow testimony from Jodi Arias that she walked in on Travis entertaining himself while looking at photographs of boys, apparently underage. One of the DEFENSE expert witnesses testified by phone in this hearing that JA told her that the pictures were on Travis' computer. Martinez put on one of the computer experts who said there was absolutely nothing on TA's computer...no photos, no Internet history...related to child pornography. Also Detective Flores testified at the hearing that there were no photographs recovered from TA's home. Another expert (Dr Samuels) had said in his report that she walked into TA's room and found TA on his bed surrounded by actual photographs. He would have had to get rid of them, if they existed, to have NOTHING there when he unknowingly was attacked and murdered. JA is claiming that the level of physical violence by TA against her increased after this because she knew his dirty little secret. JA will testify to it today or tomorrow, and then be cross-examined about it. She never mentioned this before to anyone. Jodi had several PHOTOCOPIED letters supposedly written by TA to JA about this child pornography issue, but she can't produce the originals and the state contends that she wrote them...never mentioned them to anyone for two years after she killed Travis.

Vinnie Politan has the transcript from Thursday's hearing...JA claims that it was that day, when she walked in on him, that he first attacked her. This was in January 2008, 5 months before she killed him.

I'm wondering if they're going to claim that she was going to tell, or he was afraid she would, so he got rid of the pictures (or maybe, since she's SUCH A GOOD GIRL, she got rid of them) and that's why there's no evidence of them. If she claimed they were on the computer, she probably knows enough about computers to know there'd still be evidence of that. I guess the defense can always tear apart the person who claims she said the pictures were on the computer, saying the person automatically interpreted what she had said about child pornography as being on the computer? Or did she say they were on the computer to the first person she told, and they informed her there was no evidence on the computer, and she corrected herself that they were real pictures, and like CA, just went with that story, filling in as needed with helpful "facts" like why there are no actual photographs in his house.
__________________
MaryAnnDVC is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.