|
|
#166 |
|
- Join date March 2004 -
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,661
|
I can't imagine dealing with media scrutiny and how it's going to go beyond even what it was.
__________________
LIFE IS GOOD
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 | |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kettering, UK
Posts: 5,588
|
Quote:
http://royalgossip.forumprofi.de/ind...,5738.460.html This was written by a user name Windsor2 It wouldn't surprise me if they were separated. It would be hilarious if she weren't pregnant but did this to force Wills hand and back into her bed. It would make sense if Wills didn't know she was up the duff (because she's not or if she is she didn't tell him until she was in hospital) and that's why HM and Charles weren't informed. I read a story regarding HM not knowing and the reporter saying that the the announcement off the pregnancy wasn't organized. I know the theory's out there but when you think about it, it doesn't seem too far fetched. They come up with this HG diagnosis so that enables them to hide away and do no work for the foreseeable future. So now all she has to do is either get pregnant or keep the baby in her. Either way, we'll not be seeing her out and about I believe. She can now pull Wills chains any time because the Punic perceives him as a dotting husband and a caring father to be. The Midds a would leak goths press if he steps out if line. He wouldn't be hostage to the Midds if he didn't care about his fake image that the press has of him IMO. Odd that there's no official word from BP or CH regarding this pregnancy. They could be waiting for her to pass the 3 month mark. I hope my post makes some sense. At the end of the day, Waity and the Midds are going to use this pregnancy for all it's worth as Waity takes advantage of the sympathy she has gotten and lazes around and laughter at the gullible people and the idiot royals who allowed her to marry Wills in the first place. Marie Antoinette and Ann Boylynn raises their ugly heads once again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,353
|
Oh my!
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
I REALLY AM a Princess!!!
Hands off the crown! It's not for trade :) Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 8,713
|
Color me confused, and I confess I didn't read through this entire thread, but I'm stuck on the fact that they call her "Duchess" and not "Princess" but yet her husband is always referred to as PRINCE William, not DUKE William.
What am I missing? lol
__________________
__________________
Me (48)2013 Book Challenge: 17 out of 50 ![]() Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Defending Jacob, Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can't Stop Talking, The Passage, The Shoemaker's Wife, Fairest of All: A Tale of the Wicked Queen, Fluke, Into the Darkest Corner, Where'd You Go Bernadette, The Fall of Giants, The Great Gatsby, Rush Home Road, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Wheat Belly, The Kite Runner, To Be Sung Underwater, The Light Between Oceans Currently reading: "I Heart New York" and "Mere Christianity" ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Holy
![]() Hello. My name is Inigo Peeptoya...you ate my father...prepare to die Ok fess up...who killed the riddle? Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Middle-Earth
Posts: 5,359
|
As I understand and if I am off someone please correct me. To be titled princess you have to be born one. Either be born the daughter of a reigning monarch or be a granddaughter in the male line. The Duchess will only be able to style herself as princess as a courtesy when William is invested as The Prince of Wales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
It's a miracle! I stayed awake during the El Rio Del Tiempo ride!
Let's not even TOUCH the whole Dog vs. dawg vs. Dowg thing! PLINKO baby! Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Triad, NC
Posts: 20,833
|
The news has been referring to them as the Duke and Duchess.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 | |
|
My oh my what a wonderful day!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,686
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
These pretzels are making me thirsty!
I feel like we are in the middle of A Very Brady Idol Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,194
|
As fasinating as I find the Royal Family I do admit that I am easily confused as to who has what title and what is protocol.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,014
|
nevermind I misread it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 | |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,353
|
Quote:
The short answer is that technically she could be known as Princess William of Wales via William's title of Prince. This is similar to the styling of Princess Michael of Kent's name. However, upon her marriage the Queen granted William the title of Duke of Cambridge and announced that her name would be styled as HRH Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. She gave him a couple of other Titles at the time also and technically they could use any of these as their official names. So that is the short answer, she is called Duchess because the Queen said she's called Duchess and the Queen is the boss. As to why the Palace did not promote her as a "Princess" right off the bat probably has to do with where we are in history. Prince William is a Prince of Wales because of his birth, however he is not yet THE Prince of Wales. That is the big difference between the marriage of Charles/Diana, and William/Kate. Charles was The Prince of Wales and William is yet still 3rd in line to the throne. When (almost certainly) Charles becomes King he will almost certainly grant William the title of Prince of Wales and almost certainly at that time Kate will be come Catherine, Princess of Wales. That however is not always the case. Camilla at the moment technically has the right to be called Camilla, Princess of Wales but in deference to Princess Diana does not use that title and likely never will. Public opinion on whether or not she will ever even be called Queen Camilla when the time comes goes back and forth. I've read articles where Charles has stated she will be Queen and I've read articles that claim he has stated no. Even after all this time, she is kind of a thorn of non-popularity in Britain and they might decide it better for her not to use the title of Queen Consort. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 | ||
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,673
|
From Wikipedia
Quote:
Which style to use is another thing, again as RitaE pointed out, Camilla does not use that title even though I believe she holds it. ETA, nope Camilla's full style Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,145
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 | |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Brighton UK /Bradenton FLA
Posts: 2,475
|
Quote:
ford family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#179 | ||
|
My oh my what a wonderful day!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,686
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,353
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|