lockedoutlogic
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
Look I never got to experience the yeti working but I don't think Vekoma builds mountains. That's WDI.
I realize that...but why settle and make it "ok"?
Everest was announced - if you may recall - at the start of the Eisner/roy proxy battle. In fact...it was always too convenient how it was "greenlit" and old Mikey did a presser to announce it. I'll have to see if it's out there on YouTube.
In it...true story...they talked about the yeti, yeti, yeti and a little about the switchtrack ride. The "building" wasn't the stress point.
I know you love ak...and that's ok. I like it a lot...it will never be my favorite but it's a close second with two others down there...but still.
But the standard defense of ak is that people don't "get it" and it's all about the "detail". First - the detail is great...but with that there is an embedded attempt to distract from the substance...which ak has never completed. Mgm hasn't either...but nobody makes studios out to be modern art.
"The mountain is wdi"...falls
Along that "you don't get it" line. I know they went outsource and got screwed...but that doesn't mean "oh well, it's still great. It's six flags in beta mode...they can do that.
The ride was built with 3 components and arguably the most important element doesn't work.
I'm just gonna use their own ammo against them:
they build "attractions" that tell a storyline...not just "rides". Cedar point and magic mountain build "rides"...anybody - vekoma - can hire an engineer and build a tubular steel coaster.
Can't dance on this line...either it's "more" or it's just a ride not worthy of Disney or the price tag.
I know...never an inch from me...but tell me how I'm misinterpreting it and the bar should be "lowered"? I'm tough but fair.